![]() Double precision on the faders, a really friendly interface with plenty of visual feedback from these OLEDs and the use of colour in the illuminated buttons. As such, in terms of integration with the DAW this isn’t a fair fight but as James illustrates in his video, the UF8 and associated 360 software puts in an impressive performance. Pro Tools is very much a case in point here as the obvious competition in this space is the Avid S1, which as an Avid product is Eucon enabled. The UF8 is trying to achieve the impossible - to allow deep control over a range of DAWs, including Pro Tools using HUI. However, if you’re not using Studio One some of these features aren’t available. If you are a Studio One user then the Faderport surfaces integrate beautifully. Avid have Eucon, which shares deep integration between Pro Tools and Eucon enabled surfaces and understandably Avid are going to use their proprietary technology to drive sales of Avid control surfaces. There are, of course, notable exceptions and the situation varies depending on which DAW you are using with which surface. Basic visual feedback such as truncated track names and there being no way to share the track colour between DAW and surface make the amount of visual feedback presented by many control surfaces less than ideal. The other hurdle such controllers have to overcome is the extent of the information shared between the DAW and the controller. HUI is the basis of many of these surfaces and HUI is nearly as old as MIDI! It’s a remarkable achievement how much mileage designers still manage to get out of it but in spite of double-precision faders, the 128 values available in MIDI limits the usefulness of these controllers for parameters with a large range of values such as EQ frequency. This isn’t only the fault of the surface designers, it’s usually a consequence of the limitation of the technology being used to communicate with the DAW. Basically, what we hear again and again is that they are useful for fader moves and automation passes but come up short when facing more complex tasks such as plugin control, often because of a lack of visual feedback forcing the user to refer to the DAW on-screen to interpret what the control surface is doing. However, when these controllers are actually lived with day to day, they often end up under-used because of a lack of deep integration with the host DAW and because of shortcomings in the connection protocol used. There are far more options than these, particularly when you look at lower-cost MIDI controllers, which are effectively the MIDI control faders from a MIDI keyboard but packaged without the keyboard. The PreSonus Faderport 8, the Behringer X Touch, the Mackie Control Universal Pro, and the Softube Console 1 Fader. Then we have a range of options all, in the region of around 8 faders. The PreSonus Faderport and the Avid Dock spring to mind. We have the single fader surfaces, one fader being infinitely more than none after all. ![]() Some designs dispense with a fader altogether, the Softube Console 1 being an obvious example. 8 faders seem to be the sweet spot between having a useful number of faders and having something which can sit on your desk rather than be your desk. Many companies have released small desktop control surfaces. Our friends at Studiospares have created this video with James Ivey, a confirmed control surface skeptic, for an in-depth look at the new UF8 controller from SSL. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |